Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine
![]()
starting soon ...
Somerset (BM) - Jan 4
Jeffersonville (IN) - Jan 8
Altoona (WI) - Jan 9
Mitchellville (MD) - Jan 10
Chippewah Valley (WI) - Jan 10
Cedar Lake (MI) - Jan 15
St. Louis Central (MO) - Jan 16
Scottsbluff (NE) - Jan 16
Greeneville (TN) - Jan 16
Port Orchard (WA) - Jan 16
Johnston (RI) - Jan 17
Orlando (FL) - Jan 21
Battleground (WA) - Jan 22
Ricklin (CA) - Jan 22
Sacramento (CA) - Jan 22
Houston (TX) - Jan 22
Escondido (CA) - Jan 22
Canoga Park (CA) - Jan 23
Winnetke (CA) - Jan 23
Warwick(Bermuda), Jan 23
Fayette (GA) - Jan 26
Ridgecrest (CA) - Jan 26
Rockford SDA (IL) - Feb 26
Juneau (AK) - Jan 29
Loveland (CO) - Jan 29
Lincoln (NE) - Jan 29
Lodi (CA) - Jan 30
Nelsonville (OH) - Jan 30
Fayetteville (NC) - Feb 2
Missouri State U (MO) - Feb 2
Spencer (WV) - Feb 5
Pensacola (FL) - Feb 6
Bemidji (MN) - Feb 12
Walla Walla - Feb 15
Raleigh (NC) - Feb 16
Fort Myers (FL) - Feb 16
Aldergrove (BC) - Feb 19
Manteca (CA) - Feb 20
Centerville (OH) - Feb 22
Central (WI) -Feb 26
Greenvale (VIC) - Feb 27
Hawerd (NZ) - Feb 27
London (ON) - Feb 27
Sarnia (ON) - Feb 27
Avon Park (FL) - Mar
Coquille (OR) - Mar
Round Rock (TX) - Mar 4
Savanna (IL) - Mar 4
Beltsville (MD) - Mar 5
Quesnel (BC) - Mar 5
Blairsville (GA) - Mar 5
Cottonwood (AZ) - Mar 6
Martinsburg (WV) - Mar 11
Oxford (ME) - Mar 12
San Francisco (CA) - Mar 12
Centerville (TN) - Mar 15
Loma Linda (CA) - Mar 18
Chadron (NE) - Mar 18
Berrien Springs (MI) - Mar 25
Des Moines (IA) - Mar 26
Martinsville (VA) - Mar 26
Coquille (OR) - Mar 30
Fort Wayne (IN) - April
Westminister (BC) - April
Neenah (WI) - Apr 2
Carson City (NV) - Apr 2
Athens (OH), Apr 3
Largo (MD) - Apr 8
Dodge Center (MN) - Apr 15
Winnepeg (MB) - Apr 15
Deltona (FL) - Apr 15
Johnston (RI) - Jun 15
Kota Kinabalu (MY) - May
Anchorage (AK) - Aug 1
Santa Cruz (CA) - Sep 2
Placerville (CA) - Sep 10
Appleton (WI) - Oct 1
Portage (WI) - Oct 3
Augusta (GA) - Dec 1
History: How It
All Began
by Ethel Nelson, MD
“We’re sorry, but
there’s nothing more we can do for you.”
At age 59, Connie Thebarge had just been given what essentially was a
death sentence from her doctors. What could she do? Where could she go?
If the prestigious Ottawa Heart Institute couldn’t help her, then who
could?
The prognosis had not been entirely unexpected. Connie knew that things
were not going well with her. Considering her longstanding
•
history of hypertension;
• two heart attacks followed by triple coronary bypass
surgery;
• diagnosed with diabetes in 1985;
• unsuccessful angioplasty in 1988;
• diabetic neuropathy in her legs making walking
excruciatingly painful;
• her pill count up to 27 a day.
What sort of good news could she expect? No
wonder she was depressed!
And yet, 12 years later, Connie is walking three miles a day, swimming
twice a week, dancing and taking trips to Florida and Europe. The
depression and angina are gone, and so are most of her pills—all thanks
to a complete lifestyle change.
CHIP Project
Amazing, you say. Not at all. How was this accomplished? By
following the principles and practices promoted by the Complete Health
Improvement Program (CHIP) a community-based lifestyle intervention
program designed to drastically reduce coronary risk and improve health.
Is community-based lifestyle change possible? Critics have argued
that lasting lifestyle change is not possible and that the only real
solution is through drug or surgical therapy. During the past three
decades, hospital-based and resort-style lifestyle centers, however,
have proven otherwise. But can such programs be successfully extended to
communities? And can these educational programs make a significant dent
in solving the runaway epidemic of coronary heart disease, diabetes,
hypertension and obesity that especially plagues the affluent nations of
the world?
Lifestyle Medicine
Institute
Part of the answer may be found in the amazing growth of the small
but ambitious Loma Linda-based Lifestyle Medicine Institute in Southern
California, directed by cardiovascular epidemiologist, Hans Diehl. Dr.
Diehl’s CHIP programs have been conducted successfully in more than 150
cities in North America as well as in Bangalore, India, Australia, and
in Switzerland.
Perhaps the success of the Lifestyle Medicine Institute (LMI) has
more to do with its mission rather than its uniqueness. Many institutes
for lifestyle change exist, but few have LMI’s ambitious drive to reach
the public with the “good news” that being healthy is a personal right.
Who then is Hans Diehl? Is his CHIP program the model for realistic
health change, or is it just another profit-making venture preying on
the fears of people in trouble?
To answer that question we need to go back to the beginning and
follow the activities and events, which led to the formation of the
Lifestyle Medicine Institute and to the concept of community-based
health promotion as embodied in CHIP.
Coming to Montreal from Germany in 1965 as a young executive trained by
the Krups Corporation, 19-year-old Diehl was amazed at the possibilities
North America held out to young people. Before too long, he returned to
college and enrolled in premed. After graduation from Loma Linda
University’s School of Public Health with a doctorate in Health Science
and a Master’s in Public Health Nutrition, he took post-doctorate
training in epidemiology at the University of California at Los Angeles.
Nathan Pritikin
Meanwhile, Nathan Pritikin, a non-medical visionary was causing
ripples in the medical community with his claim that simple lifestyle
changes in diet, smoking and exercise could dramatically improve the
clinical course of coronary heart disease, diabetes, hypertension, gout,
arthritis and obesity—”diseases of dietary abundance,” he called them.
Intrigued by progress reports from the Santa Barbara-based, four-week,
residential intervention program, Diehl visited Pritikin and asked him
about his success rates with essential hypertension.
“About 80%,” Pritikin replied. “It’s an estimate, since I’ve not
yet analyzed my medical records.”
Incredulous at this high percentage, Diehl offered to do the
statistical analysis to examine the claim. “If these figures are
correct,” he thought to himself, “then Pritikin may be on to something
very significant and important.”
Pritikin took on Diehl, and Diehl proved Pritikin wrong: within four
weeks, not 80%, but 83% of the 225 hypertensive patients on medication
were drug-free and normotensive. They no longer required pills to lower
their blood pressure. That was enough to entice Diehl to join the
Pritikin Longevity Center as its first director of research and
education.
Diehl observed that Pritikin not only emphasized a diet drastically
lower in fat, sugar, salt and cholesterol, but he also promoted
progressive exercise for the patients flocking to his
physician-monitored center. On his advisory board were two British
physicians, Drs. Denis Burkitt and Hugh Trowell. Internationally known
for their advocacy of a high-fiber diet, they reinforced Pritikin’s
commitment to a fiber-rich diet centered around unrefined grains,
fruits, vegetables and legumes.
Observing the rapid, consistent and nearly miraculous improvement
of patients under close staff physician supervision, Diehl began to
wonder to what extent such a lifestyle medicine approach could be used
on a community-wide basis. Instead of spending $8,000 to $13,000 with
institutional supervision, perhaps the same results could be
accomplished for a fraction of this cost thus reaching a much larger
segment of the population.
For the next several years Diehl kept this idea in the back of his
mind, waiting for the right opportunity. In the meantime, he spent two
years as a National Institutes of Health-supported research fellow in
cardiovascular epidemiology at Loma Linda University where he analyzed
Pritikin’s data in more detail. At the same time, he began to lecture
about the potential of reversing many of the so-called “Western killer
diseases.” It wasn’t long before a following developed.
Among them was a middle-aged, discouraged woman from Wisconsin who
later described herself as a “Fat droopy worm who’d heard a two-hour
lecture on ‘How to Eat More and Weigh Less.’” Maybe there was a way to
avoid the diseases that had claimed her parents and grand parents.
Having hit bottom, she decided to give it a try and began to follow the
principles.
A year later, Grace Jones reported, “The worm has become a
butterfly. Every facet of my life has changed. My aches have
disappeared. I’ve lost 40 pounds, and I’m still losing. My blood
pressure is down to 120/70 and my cholesterol at the lowest ever—139
mg%. I walk regularly and I have as much energy and endurance as I had
at age 21. “And,” she added, “my depression is gone.”
Creston CHIP
Finally, in 1986, a breakthrough came when Sidney Kettner, MD, then
chief-of-staff of the Creston Valley Hospital, invited Diehl to conduct
a four-week CHIP in this British Columbia community of 3,000 adults.
Diehl carefully planned 40 hours of instructive motivational lectures.
After meager advertising, to the organizer’s amazement, some 400
responded to the Creston experiment conducted in mid-winter.
Before the lectures began, a coronary risk assessment — called
HeartScreen — was made, including a brief medical and medication
history, blood chemistry (testing for cholesterol, LDL, HDL,
triglycerides, glucose), blood pressures, overweight determination,
smoking history, stress level, casual heart rate, and level of exercise.
A food frequency was also included.
The four-week educational program conducted Monday through Thursday
covered the areas of physiology, clinical management and lifestyle
interventions for coronary heart disease (CHD), hypertension, diabetes
and obesity. Cooperation came not only from physicians and dietitians,
but also from merchants who were encouraged to provide “healthier” foods
at special discounts. Supermarkets had “specials” for fresh produce;
local bakeries promoted multi-grain breads at 30% discount, and local
health food stores provided “specials” for low-sodium condiments,
multi-grain breakfast cereals and scores of crock pots.
Individualized HeartScreen evaluations were made by Dr. Diehl and
participating physicians following an established protocol. All clinical
parameters were re-tested four weeks later, after three months and then
again after one year
Fred MacKay, a 70-year-old hypertensive farmer who had suffered heart
attacks in 1984 and 1987, was told by his doctor to change his diet. He
substituted chicken for beef and reduced his dairy intake. But after
hearing Diehl’s lectures, he decided he had to become much stricter with
his diet and to increase his daily 30-minute walk to two hours a day.
After only two weeks, Fred’s cholesterol had dropped 13%, he’d lost four
pounds, and his blood pressure was near normal. Eight years, 26 pairs of
hiking boots, and 20,000 miles later, his weight had dropped from 185 to
an ideal 160 pounds, his cholesterol had fallen from 202 to 120 mg%, and
his blood pressure was normal.
During the same CHIP campaign, an initially skeptical reporter
dropped 40 pounds and became a believer.
Quick to see the advantages of such a program in reducing the cost of
governmental health care, provincial health officials approached Dr.
Diehl to see if he would conduct a CHIP research project in Vancouver,
British Columbia. Diehl declined, however, feeling he was not yet ready
for the big city. Much more had to be learned. He set a five-year goal
for himself, hoping at the end of that time to enter a major city with a
proven health program.
Vernon, Kelowna CHIP
After Creston, Diehl was invited to the town of Vernon with a
population of 25,000. Some 1,500 attended. Then came Kelowna, only 30
minutes from Vernon. Of the 50,000 adult population, more than 2,500
attended the CHIP program in four programs, six months apart.
Diehl soon learned that greater numbers of people would join
the program if certain advanced preparations were made in the community.
So, six months prior to the Vernon CHIP project, he laid the groundwork
by contacting the “gate-keepers of the community”—the local medical
society, the clergy, the media, the city council, the mayor and the
merchants. It was soon evident that greater supplies of recommended
fruits and vegetables must be stocked to accommodate the participants’
demands. When he suggested, for instance, in the Cornwall project, that
instead of a candy bar the CHIP attendants eat a mango—the rush was on.
Convincing the grocers, however, was another thing. “Mangoes?” they
laughed. “The people here don’t even know what a mango is!”
“They soon will—I guarantee it. Order 500 mangoes,” Diehl
insisted.
During the campaign, 7,000 mangoes were sold. And not for the usual
dollar apiece. “We need CHIP-cheap produce!” Diehl argued. Result:
Mangoes 3/$1.00. Both grocers and customers were exuberant!
The local bakeries, given Diehl’s 100% whole-wheat bread
recipe, cooperated with record sales and again, everyone was happy.
Long-term results were encouraging. Periodic testing of CHIP
participants showed that average blood cholesterol levels after one year
were still down 10%. Diehl reminded participants that blood cholesterol
reduction is the most important factor in lowering the coronary risk.
“For every 1% drop in cholesterol, heart attack risk drops 3%.” The most
improvement was shown by those in the highest cholesterol group (greater
than 240 mg%) who showed a 17% reduction, cutting their coronary risk in
half.
During the four-week intervention period, “overweight” and
“obese” CHIP participants lost an average of six and eight pounds
respectively. Yet, they claimed, “We’ve never eaten so much food in our
lives.” This was exactly what Diehl had promised would happen.
At the end of one year only 7% of the participants were unable to
keep their weight down, an astounding success rate when compared to the
usual 90% “relapse” that most weight control programs suffer during
their first year. Instead, 93% of the obese participants lost an average
of 16 lbs. The proof was in: People had not just changed their
diets—they had changed their lifestyles!
Reverend Albert Baldeo, a well-known Kelowna clergyman, added
his testimony, “I was standing at an open grave one day conducting a
funeral when I became dizzy and almost fell in. I gasped to myself,
“Lord, not yet!” and determined to do something about my high blood
pressure and excessive weight. I joined the very next CHIP program. My
blood pressure plummeted and in time I lost 50 pounds. Of course, it
cost the church, because they had to buy me new vestments! But the
congregation was elated to have a pastor with a new silhouette!”
Lifestyle changes, however, were not limited to diet. While about
5% said they engaged in “vigorous exercise” at the beginning of the
program, the percentage jumped to 23% by the end of the four-week
series. Some 52% reported having moved to more strenuous levels of
exercise.
At the same time, systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels
decreased significantly in spite of marked reductions in the amount of
medication. The same happened with diabetic patients: many with high
blood sugar levels or on diabetic pills or insulin, found their blood
sugar levels coming down so much that physicians often had to reduce or
discontinue the medications. In addition, elevated triglycerides dropped
15% in four weeks.
These early demonstration projects proved not only that people were
interested in improving their health but also that coronary health risk
factors could be significantly decreased through a community-based
health education program. In addition, CHIP proved that positive
clinical changes could be sustained over time and that these
improvements could be delivered in a cost-effective manner largely
funded by the participants themselves.
Alumni Chapters
At the end of each four-week CHIP program, on graduation night,
Diehl encourages graduates to form local CHIP alumni organizations. They
would choose officers, charge annual membership fees, and set up monthly
educational meetings featuring well-known health/medical lecturers,
vegetarian cooking classes, seminars dealing with stress management,
stop smoking classes, and “CHIP-nics.” In addition, members are kept
informed through regular CHIP newsletters.
But the story doesn’t end here. News of these small successes would
soon spread to unexpected new places.